Rolling Bulk Liquid Transport

 

1. Overview
 

The U.S. Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory ("MCWL") in Quantico, VA, has contracted InSitech, Inc., to help the Lab discover a broader spectrum of innovative and non-traditional technology providers than its current mechanisms and resources typically provide. InSitech is under contract with MCWL to perform this outreach, review the responses, rate the responses, and brief them on the responses.
 

Response to this technology Topic is at the discretion of the Respondent. There is no guarantee of selection or funding, and neither this Topic nor its responses obligate the U.S. Government or InSitech in any way.
 

About this Opportunity

 

  • This outreach effort is for market research; the objective is to determine whether promising technologies and technology development partners exist

  • Responses to this outreach may be evaluated by InSitech and the U.S. Government

  • Based on the U.S. Government's evaluation (and through possible follow-on discussions with selected respondents), the U.S. Government may decide to fund programs around promising technology areas (if any) via a U.S. Government issued solicitation

  • Respondents to this outreach may be specifically invited by the U.S. Government to respond to U.S. Government issued solicitations on these topics with proposals

  • Respondents to this outreach may also be specifically presented with other opportunities to partner with the U.S. Government through mechanisms such as Collaborative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA's)

  • U.S. and non-U.S. companies and academic institutions are invited to respond to this RFI
     

2. Statement of Need
 

The Marine Corps is seeking a 350 – 500 gallon lightweight, durable fuel container that can be transported from ship/seabase to shore and on land, i.e. amphibious transport. The container can be towed by any program of record (POR) land vehicles such as the AAVs, HMMWVs, MTVRs or MRAPs, but specific emphasis needs to be placed on the amphibious vehicles such as the AAV-P7/A1 amphibious assault vehicle (AAV).
 

When being towed through water, the container must create minimal drag on the towing craft, and not negatively affect the craft stability/mobility. Typical towing/travel speed through water is 8-10 knots. When being towed or traveling on land, the container must be capable of traversing the same type of terrain as other Marine vehicles such as the AAV, HMMWV, MTVR or MRAP with little to no negative effect on the vehicles’ current speed restrictions on different surface conditions. The ability to connect in linear series (i.e. daisy chain) up to 5 containers for towing/traveling on land is a requirement. The key here is the ability to transfer fuel from ship to shore via amphibious vehicles as well as support distributed operations across any terrain with any POR vehicle. A secondary benefit of such a technology would be the risk to assets mitigated in the event of one being destroyed by improvised explosive device or otherwise, i.e. the entire fuel load is not lost. A tertiary benefit would be a reduction of cargo space sacrificed on the amphibious vehicles to get fuel ashore.
 

Each fuel container will be stowed empty onboard a ship or seabase where it will be filled with fuel just prior to deployment. Each container should be designed to take up as little space as possible, such as by being collapsible, nestable, or able to use the same space as other consumable items like spare vehicle tires. The container should be able to accept and dispense fuel with a standard fuel pump, or have a built-in fuel pump to allow it to distribute the fuel to Marine vehicles once it reaches its destination. Any built-in fuel pump should not restrict the mobility of the container.
 

For illustrative purposes, the Marine Corps has provided the following background information below: (i) a video link that shows a similar fuel container system used by the US Army in the 1960’s, and (ii) an expired US patent that also describes a similar system.
 

  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bLPJ0S5qhQ - The last 15 sec of the video specifically show the amphibious capability of interest.

  2. http://www.google.com/patents/US3264007

 

3. Instructions for Respondents
 

In order to have your company's technology considered under this process, you will need to submit a white paper that includes information about your company, its capabilities, and the proposed solution to the stated technology need. The white paper requirements are provided below.  WHITE PAPERS ARE DUE BY 12:00 MIDNIGHT ON JANUARY 5, 2016.  Incomplete white papers and white papers received after that time may not be accepted.  InSitech, Inc., and the Government will NOT accept or respond to questions from respondents under this RFI process. Should the Government decide to issue a U.S. Government issued solicitation on this topic in the future, standard Government Q&A practices will be employed at that time. Please e-mail your white paper to MCWLOpportunities@insitech.org.
 

By submitting your white paper you acknowledge that you are not providing privileged information (confidential, trade secrets, unpublished patents, etc.) or sensitive information of any kind whatsoever. Please note that, due to the market survey nature of this outreach, as well as to the role InSitech plays as an intermediary between the US Government and private sector companies, InSitech does not sign nondisclosure or confidentiality agreements in connection with white paper submittals. However, in select cases where a response appears particularly promising and the provision of confidential information would aid further evaluation, InSitech will sign a reasonable non-disclosure agreement if there is mutual interest in doing so.
 

4. White Paper Requirements
 

Interested parties should submit white papers not to exceed ten (10) pages, with one inch margins, and no smaller than 12 pt Times New Roman or Courier New font in Microsoft Word or pdf format. The white paper should not exceed 6 MB in size. The white paper should be a stand-alone, self-explanatory document free of Specialist language, or references to third-party works, unless these latter are summarized in the Paper itself. The white paper must include the following elements: (1) Company name, physical address and website address, (2) Name, title, telephone number, and e-mail address of company's main point(s) of contact, (3) A statement of the respondent's understanding of the Government's requirements, (4) A description of the respondent's core capabilities and technology, (5) A description of the proposed technology solution, (6) A feasibility assessment of the solution and how it meets the Government requirements, (7) A high-level discussion of the costs involved (ranges/order of magnitude acceptable at this stage), (8) A high-level risk assessment that articulates the respondent's understanding of associated risks, (9) An estimate of Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) of major subsystems, components, and the system as a whole, (10) A description of any projects that the respondents company is or has been involved in that are similar in concept to what is described in this topic. This should include any relevant lessons learned, (11) A summary of any independent testing/evaluation results and fielded applications, and (12) Any additional materials that are deemed appropriate by the respondent. In addition to the 10-page limit, respondents may append to the white paper, at their own discretion, the bios of the key management and technical personnel relevant to the proposed technology solution. Submittals of bios is optional.
 

5. Evaluation of Responses
 

Major evaluation factors shall include (1) Overall technical merit of the proposed technology solution, (2) Degree in which the technology solution performance/functionality addresses the Government needs, (3) Estimated maturity level for military application, and (4) Overall business profile of the respondent. InSitech, Inc., may contact respondents to address any omissions and/or clarifications to their respective RFI white papers as part of the evaluation process.